Reader's response (Draft 1)

In the article “The Double Edge of Globalization”, Chanda (2007) states that globalization has increased international trade and consumption. It has also led to the improvement of global telecommunications, which enables instantaneous transmission of information to the world. However, globalization has caused environmental devastation such as deforestation, increased pollution and global warming.

According to Chanda (2007), globalization has accelerated the rate of deforestation, which has caused severe environmental damages. Chanda mentioned, “Globalization does serve as both a conduit and an accelerator to the loss of forest cover worldwide”. 

I agree with Chandra’s view on this matter. Globalization encourages the consumption for goods and services, which has led to more forest clearing in recent years. An example given would be China’s growing demand for soybeans. Chanda also stresses that deforestation is accountable for more global carbon emissions. In addition, deforestation not only leads to global warming and increased pollution, but it has also caused habitat loss for many species. This shows that habitat destruction also became responsible for the extinctions of species.

No doubt, globalization has brought about many benefits to the world. Yet I strongly believe that the environmental damages caused by deforestation is much more detrimental, and it requires immediate attention. However, with the commitment of nations and effective global governance, it is possible to avert these consequences.